I can’t imagine how this could go poorly. /s

  • roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I can tell just from looking that they’re just btle not gps. Thankfully both Google and Apple tell you when a tag on their networks is traveling with you. So either these are trash because they’re not on the two largest networks that share data, or they’re useless because they are and if you have a smart phone it’ll warn you.

    • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I’ve seen some pretty small GPS trackers with cell modems, I wouldn’t be surprised if these were that instead depending on the price.

      • gressen@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Fortunately they hold the charge for realistically short time and therefore are limited in use.

      • roofuskit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        It has way less to do with the size of the device and more to do with the size of the battery. Not much room left at all between the cell modem and GPS antenna required to make that thing work.

        • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Indeed, the models I have seen have a very short battery life, or check in infrequently, or only check in when movement is detected, or use cell signal triangulation to save battery, etc.

    • paraphrand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      19 hours ago

      At the end of the article they say many of the listings have terrible reviews because the safety features in FindMy were triggered.

      If any of these devices use the networks Google and Apple made, they are not gps.