• willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Of course the power dynamics cannot ever be eliminated (either by breeding or enculturation) from the interpersonal relationships.

    Instead, power can be regulated and managed, to maximize distributed decisionmaking, and to protect those decisionmakers who could not or would not protect themselves.

    In a free for all, feudalism will always result. The strong and the willing will rule over the weak and the unwilling.

    There have to be limits to the power dynamics. Those limits will have to be enforced to protect the vulnerable, the gullible, and the unwilling (those who have the capability to exercise power, but refuse by choice), etc. This requires advanced democratic governance with a very strong government.

    Doing away with the government is just a speedrun toward technofeudalism.

    Working to create a protected space that selects for distributed decisionmaking is the actual project. That’s an actually sane, worthwhile and achievable goal.

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I think we’re fairly close to agreement.

      The things I do to encourage anarchism are things like makerspaces, community gardens, and bike fixup workshops. Anything that helps people rely less on capitalism and more on each other.