• Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      No. That’s not what I said. Please stop trying to frame this like I am pro-starlink. I’m not.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m just trying to understand why this argument is even happening.

        You seem to basically agree with them. What’s even the point?

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          It is simply harder to sabotage if the wires are underground and cannot be readily seen by hostile actors.

          This statement is not correct. It is the topic being discussed. Fiber network are more vulnerable than satellite networks. It takes specialized weapons to take out a single satellite link. Any idiot with wire clippers can take out a fiber link, and it happens all the time. Fiber networks are more difficult to replace at scale than a satellite network, and individuals links are more important to fiber network than they are to satellite networks.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            The thread topic is SpaceX saying we should dump all fiber plans and go with Starlink.

            I had to clarify what you were arguing about, because otherwise I was going to yell at you about latency issues and data throttling and the risks of Kessler syndrome and about how bad it is to put critical infrastructure in the hands of a single company.