• Kissaki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I found the intro hook intriguing, but the reporting starts with a lot of media clips and other run-ups, which eventually made me leave.

    It’s great they put in so much effort into genuine, on-site reporting, but the already long video report feels even more bloated/filled this way.

    I have to wonder if the DMCA was due to the news clips. While they may be fair use for contextualized reporting, I didn’t find them particularly valuable, and DMCA issues could have been avoided without them or without using so many of them.

    • Bilb!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I have to wonder if the DMCA was due to the news clips. While they may be fair use for contextualized reporting, I didn’t find them particularly valuable, and DMCA issues could have been avoided without them or without using so many of them.

      They have said that Bloomburg footage of trump talking about GPUs was the claim. They probably did play a little too fast and loose with copyrighted footage.

    • shoe@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Exactly the same - I was very interested in the premise but struggled to make it past this section, too, for the same reasons you’ve mentioned. Would certainly agree that these clips should’ve been used more sparingly, as it’s a bit of a slog otherwise.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    169
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m sure this takedown will in no way bring attention to this video.

  • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    139
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    iirc theyre active on reddit talking about the situation. basically bloomberg lawyers probably striked it for a segment they included in the video, but GN thinks theyre fine because itll be covered by fair use. Basically nothing to do with the parties involved in the topics of the video.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      They should put it up on peertube and get some visibility for the platform

  • qupada@fedia.io
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    2 days ago

    Thanks for the heads-up, added the internet archive torrent to seed up to 25MB/s

  • Pope-King Joe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    Damn I didn’t get to watch it. Thank Talos for the IA. I’ll add to the torrent when I get home in the morning.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    From what I understand, Bloomberg is one who placed copyright strike on video. Google would need to take a supremacist view towards the content, and supremacist deference to Bloomberg, to understand validity of complaint. What Bloomberg content was featured in documentary, and does it have any basis for unfair use claim?

    Prohibition does not work. Documentary showed some 5090 prices in Hong Kong street boutique to be same price as online US availability. It would take monumental geopolitical leverage (with bribery, loss of reserve geopolitical capital) to isolate China which is a 5x+ larger tech market than US. Geopolitical leverage the US is rapidly losing by attacking entire world simultaneously. Singapore is not going to prevent Singapore companies from profiting, hopefully paying taxes, including from employees, to Singapore, would require tremendous US government donations/complete corrupt bribery for Singapore to take “Philippines suicide pact” (Marcos tradition) approach to war on China.

    The documentary does show US policy impotence. New geopolitical US posture though is “China must be enslaved to CUDA technology so as to prevent Huawei/SMIC dominance” while China is saying “NVIDIA is a US military controlled agent intent on diminishing China, whose equipment cannot be trusted, and not purchased”

    Impotence, necessary supply chain complicity, and imminent collapse of US strategy/policy is what needs to be protected from American consciousness. It is telling that Bloomberg and Google see themselves as such propaganda enforcers. This is more of a deep state CIA favour rather than Trump Administration favour, but neither are acts of nobility.