It’s not a perspective. It just is.

It’s not complicated at all. The AI hype is just surrounded with heaps of wishful thinking, like the paper you mentioned (side note; do you know how many papers on string theory there are? And how many of those papers are actually substantial? Yeah, exactly).

A computer is incapable of becoming your new self aware, evolved, best friend simply because you turned Moby Dick into a bunch of numbers.

Sounds like you’re anthropomorphising. To you it might not have been the logical response based on its training data, but with the chaos you describe it sounds more like just a statistic.

So, this is just INS but with significantly smaller, finer measurements?

I’m pretty sure this’ll potentially reduce the error rate of INS, but not fully eliminate it.